Financial Advice and Bank Profits

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2018
Volume: 31
Issue: 11
Pages: 4447-4492

Authors (4)

Daniel Hoechle (not in RePEc) Stefan Ruenzi (Universität Mannheim) Nic Schaub (not in RePEc) Markus Schmid (Universität St. Gallen)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We use a unique data set from a large retail bank containing internal managerial accounting data on revenues and costs per client to analyze how banks and their financial advisors generate profits with customers. We find that advised transactions are associated with higher profits than independently executed trades of the same client. The bank’s own mutual funds and structured products are most profitable for the bank, and profits increase with trade size. We show that advisors recommend exactly those transactions. Furthermore, we find that advised clients achieve a worse performance than independent clients, suggesting that advisors put their employer’s interest first.Received April 21, 2016; editorial decision January 24, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:11:p:4447-4492.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-29