Government-Academic Partnerships in Randomized Evaluations: The Case of Inappropriate Prescribing

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2017
Volume: 107
Issue: 5
Pages: 466-70

Authors (3)

Adam Sacarny (National Bureau of Economic Re...) David Yokum (not in RePEc) Shantanu Agrawal (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

There is growing evidence that inappropriate prescribing is harming patients and raising costs in the US health care system. Through a partnership between the federal government and academics, we seek to develop evidence on reducing this prescribing. We conduct several randomized letter interventions targeting high-volume prescribers of drugs that can harm patients. We take a continuous improvement approach, rapidly evaluating each round and using the results to inform subsequent work. The first round of letters yielded no effects, and we responded with new interventions that are now under evaluation. We discuss lessons our work provides for future government-academic partnerships.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:466-70
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29