Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2017
Volume: 107
Issue: 5
Pages: 141-45

Score contribution per author:

8.043 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

How is credit for group work allocated when individual contributions are not observed? I use data on academics' publication records to test whether demographic traits like gender influence how credit is allocated under such uncertainty. While solo-authored papers send a clear signal about ability, coauthored papers are noisy, providing no specific information about each contributor's skills. I find that men are tenured at roughly the same rate regardless of coauthoring choices. Women, however, are less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. The result is much less pronounced among women who coauthor with other women.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:141-45
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29