Revenue equivalence revisited

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2008
Volume: 64
Issue: 1
Pages: 171-192

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The conventional wisdom in the auction design literature is that first price sealed bid auctions tend to make more money while ascending auctions tend to be more efficient. We re-examine these issues in an environment in which bidders are allowed to endogenously choose in which auction format to participate. Our findings are that more bidders choose to enter the ascending auction than the first price sealed bid auction and this extra entry is enough to make up the revenue difference between the formats. Consequently, we find that both formats raise approximately the same amount of revenue. They also generate efficiency levels and bidder earnings that are roughly equivalent across mechanisms though the earnings in the ascending might be slightly higher.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:64:y:2008:i:1:p:171-192
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29