Ratings-Based Regulation and Systematic Risk Incentives

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2019
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 1374-1415

Authors (3)

Giuliano Iannotta (not in RePEc) George Pennacchi (not in RePEc) João A C Santos (Federal Reserve Bank of New Yo...)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Our model shows that when regulation is based on credit ratings, banks with low charter value maximize shareholder value by minimizing capital and selecting identically rated loans and bonds with the highest systematic risk. This regulatory arbitrage is possible if the credit spreads on same-rated loans and bonds are greater when their systematic risk (debt beta) is higher. We empirically confirm this relationship between credit spreads, ratings, and debt betas. We also show that banks with lower capital select syndicated loans with higher debt betas and credit spreads. Banks with lower charter value choose overall assets with higher systematic risk.Received July 27, 2016; editorial decision May 29, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:4:p:1374-1415.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29