Auctions vs. fixed pricing: Competing for budget constrained buyers

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2017
Volume: 103
Issue: C
Pages: 262-285

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We investigate price mechanism selection in a setting where sellers compete for budget constrained buyers by adopting either fixed pricing or auctions (first or second price). We show that first and second price auctions are payoff equivalent when some bidders are financially constrained, so sellers are indifferent to adopt either format. We characterize possible equilibria and show that if the budget is high, then sellers compete via fixed pricing, if it is low then they compete via auctions, and if it is moderate then they mix, so both mechanisms coexist. The budget constraint becomes less binding if sellers use entry fees. Interestingly an improvement of the budget—e.g. letting customers pay in installments—may lead to fewer trades and a loss of efficiency.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:103:y:2017:i:c:p:262-285
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29