The Role of Upstream‐Downstream Competition on Bundling Decisions: Should Regulators Force Firms to Unbundle?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Year: 2009
Volume: 18
Issue: 2
Pages: 547-588

Authors (2)

Adam D. Rennhoff (not in RePEc) Konstantinos Serfes (Drexel University)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We develop an upstream–downstream model to analyze downstream firms' incentives to bundle. In our framework, the upstream firms are content providers (such as television stations) and the downstream firms are system operators (such as cable/satellite operators). We show that an a la carte regulation (i.e., a regulation that forces downstream firms to unbundle) leads to higher consumer surplus, if the unregulated equilibrium exhibits pure bundling (PB). Hence, our model predicts that in the television industry, which is mainly characterized by PB, an a la carte regulation will be beneficial for the consumers. If, on the other hand, the unregulated equilibrium is characterized by mixed bundling, then an a la carte regulation will increase consumer welfare provided that demand for multiple purchases is strong.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jemstr:v:18:y:2009:i:2:p:547-588
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29