The 5th UK alternative finance industry report

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2021
Volume: 34
Issue: 5
Pages: 2318-2361

Authors (3)

Julian Franks (not in RePEc) Nicolas Serrano-Velarde (Università Commerciale Luigi B...) Oren Sussman (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Lending marketplaces aimed at directly connecting retail lenders and borrowers retreat from auctions and, instead, set prices and allocate credit on their own, despite evidence that retail investors possess valuable soft and nonstandard information. We investigate this puzzle by analyzing a unique data set of 7,455 auctions and 34 million bids from a leading British peer-to-business platform. We find that the platform was vulnerable to liquidity shocks, resulting in sizable deviations from information efficiency. Deviations increased over time because of a growing role played by noncrowd players, particularly large investors and algorithms.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:5:p:2318-2361.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29