PEER TRANSPARENCY IN TEAMS: DOES IT HELP OR HINDER INCENTIVES?

B-Tier
Journal: International Economic Review
Year: 2012
Volume: 53
Issue: 4
Pages: 1257-1286

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In a joint project involving two players of a two‐round effort investment game with complementary efforts, transparency, by allowing players to observe each other’s efforts, achieves at least as much, and sometimes more, collective and individual efforts relative to a nontransparent environment. Without transparency multiple equilibria can arise, and transparency eliminates the inferior equilibria. When full cooperation arises only under transparency, it occurs gradually: No worker sinks in the maximum amount of effort in the first round, preferring instead to smooth out contributions over time. If the players’ efforts are substitutes, transparency makes no difference to equilibrium efforts.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:iecrev:v:53:y:2012:i:4:p:1257-1286
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24