Risky Income or Lumpy Investments? Evidence on Two Theories of Underspecialization

B-Tier
Journal: Economic Development & Cultural Change
Year: 2018
Volume: 66
Issue: 4
Pages: 629 - 671

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Why do the poor have so many economic activities? According to one theory, the poor do not specialize because relying on one income source is risky. I test the theory by measuring the response of Thai rice farmers to conditional volatility in the international rice price. Households expecting a harvest take on one extra activity when the volatility rises by 21%. I confirm that the decrease in specialization costs households foregone revenue. I find no evidence to back a second theory in which households underspecialize because they cannot afford lumpy business investments.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/697415
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29