Labor Rationing

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2021
Volume: 111
Issue: 10
Pages: 3184-3224

Authors (3)

Emily Breza (not in RePEc) Supreet Kaur (not in RePEc) Yogita Shamdasani (University of Pittsburgh)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper measures excess labor supply in equilibrium. We induce hiring shocks—which employ 24 percent of the labor force in external month-long jobs—in Indian local labor markets. In peak months, wages increase instantaneously and local aggregate employment declines. In lean months, consistent with severe labor rationing, wages and aggregate employment are unchanged, with positive employment spillovers on remaining workers, indicating that over a quarter of labor supply is rationed. At least 24 percent of lean self-employment among casual workers occurs because they cannot find jobs. Consequently, traditional survey approaches mismeasure labor market slack. Rationing has broad implications for labor market analysis.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:111:y:2021:i:10:p:3184-3224
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29