Diagnosing consumer confusion and sub-optimal shopping effort: theory and mortgage-market evidence

B-Tier
Journal: Review of Finance
Year: 2018
Volume: 22
Issue: 6
Pages: 1975-2007

Authors (4)

Gene Amromin (not in RePEc) Jennifer Huang (not in RePEc) Clemens Sialm (University of Texas-Austin) Edward Zhong (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Complex mortgages became a popular borrowing instrument during the bullish housing market of the early 2000s but vanished rapidly during the subsequent downturn. These non-traditional loans, including interest-only and negative-amortization mortgages, enable households to postpone loan repayment in contrast to fully amortizing traditional mortgages. Contrary to common perception, complex mortgages are used by households with high-income levels and prime credit scores, quite unlike the low-income population targeted by subprime mortgages. Nonetheless, we find that complex-mortgage borrowers become delinquent on their mortgages at rates twice as high as borrowers with plain-vanilla fixed-rate contracts even after controlling for household and loan characteristics. Our findings suggest a link between innovations in mortgage markets focused on prime borrowers and the financial crisis.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:revfin:v:22:y:2018:i:6:p:1975-2007.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-29