Better to be indirect? Testing the accuracy and cost-savings of indirect surveys

B-Tier
Journal: World Development
Year: 2021
Volume: 142
Issue: C

Authors (3)

Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M. (not in RePEc) Sims, Katharine R.E. (Amherst College) Costica, Laura (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We test the validity of indirect surveying as a method to collect household data. We compare household and informant reports of assets, develop poverty indices from both, test their performance as regression covariates, and examine errors in reporting and targeting resulting from using indirectly reported variables. Informant-based targeting indices are highly correlated with household measures and can be reasonable substitutes for self-reported indices in simple regressions. They can also be used to assign a simulated anti-poverty program with similar error rates to related methods. In our setting, eliminating direct household surveys would have reduced survey costs by 50%.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000310
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29