Deterring Rearrests for Drinking and Driving

C-Tier
Journal: Southern Economic Journal
Year: 2016
Volume: 83
Issue: 2
Pages: 416-436

Authors (4)

Frank Sloan (Duke University) Lindsey Eldred (not in RePEc) Sabrina McCutchan (not in RePEc) Alyssa Platt (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.251 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This study assesses why some individuals are rearrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI). Using longitudinal data from North Carolina containing information on arrests and arrest outcomes, we test hypotheses that individuals prosecuted and convicted of DWI are less likely to be rearrested for DWI. We allow for possible endogeneity of prosecution and conviction outcomes by using instrumental variables for the prosecutor's prosecution rate and the judge's conviction rate. With a three‐year follow‐up, the probability of DWI rearrest was reduced by 6.6% if the person was prosecuted for DWI and, for those prosecuted, by 24.5% if convicted on this charge. Prosecution and conviction for DWI deters rearrest for DWI.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:soecon:v:83:y:2016:i:2:p:416-436
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-29