Auction Mechanisms and Treasury Revenue: Evidence from the Chinese Experiment

B-Tier
Journal: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics
Year: 2022
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
Pages: 394-419

Authors (4)

Klenio Barbosa (SKEMA Business School) Dakshina G. De Silva (not in RePEc) Liyu Yang (not in RePEc) Hisayuki Yoshimoto (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper exploits a large-scale auction experiment conducted by two Chinese government treasury security issuers—the Chinese Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank—to investigate whether treasury securities should be sold through uniform price or discriminatory price auction mechanisms. Based on the outcomes of more than 300 treasury securities issued through an alternating auction-rule market experiment, we find that yield rates of the two auction formats are not statistically different. Further, these estimates indicate there is no significant economic difference in terms of revenue between the two auction mechanisms. This result is robust across different bond yield-rate measurements and participation behavior.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aejmic:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:394-419
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24