Judging Experimental Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2015
Volume: 105
Issue: 5
Pages: 280-85

Score contribution per author:

8.043 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This article briefly summarizes and judges recent experimental developments exploring the predictions of dynamically inconsistent models. An opinion is provided as to how the literature may evolve given these recent advances.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:5:p:280-85
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29