Intended and Unintended Consequences of Youth Bicycle Helmet Laws

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Law and Economics
Year: 2011
Volume: 54
Issue: 2
Pages: 305 - 324

Authors (2)

Christopher S. Carpenter (not in RePEc) Mark Stehr (Drexel University)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

More than 20 states have adopted laws requiring youths to wear a helmet when riding a bicycle. We confirm previous research indicating that these laws reduced fatalities and increased helmet use, but we also show that the laws significantly reduced youth bicycling. We find this result in standard two-way fixed-effects models of parental reports of youth bicycling and in triple-difference models of self-reported bicycling among high school youths that explicitly account for bicycling by youths just above the age threshold of the helmet law. Our results highlight important intended and unintended consequences of a well-intentioned public policy.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/652902
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29