Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
In one-shot games, an analyst who knows the best response correspondence can only make limited inferences about the players' payoffs. In repeated games with full monitoring, this is not true: we show that, under a weak condition, if the game is repeated sufficiently many times and players are sufficiently patient, the best response correspondence completely determines the payoffs (up to positive affine transformations).