The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind?

B-Tier
Journal: Energy Policy
Year: 2017
Volume: 101
Issue: C
Pages: 211-215

Authors (5)

Pfenninger, Stefan (not in RePEc) DeCarolis, Joseph (not in RePEc) Hirth, Lion (Hertie School) Quoilin, Sylvain (not in RePEc) Staffell, Iain (Imperial College)

Score contribution per author:

0.402 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Energy policy often builds on insights gained from quantitative energy models and their underlying data. As climate change mitigation and economic concerns drive a sustained transformation of the energy sector, transparent and well-founded analyses are more important than ever. We assert that models and their associated data must be openly available to facilitate higher quality science, greater productivity through less duplicated effort, and a more effective science-policy boundary. There are also valid reasons why data and code are not open: ethical and security concerns, unwanted exposure, additional workload, and institutional or personal inertia. Overall, energy policy research ostensibly lags behind other fields in promoting more open and reproducible science. We take stock of the status quo and propose actionable steps forward for the energy research community to ensure that it can better engage with decision-makers and continues to deliver robust policy advice in a transparent and reproducible way.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:enepol:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:211-215
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-29