The Fugitive: Evidence on Public versus Private Law Enforcement from Bail Jumping

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Law and Economics
Year: 2004
Volume: 47
Issue: 1
Pages: 93-122

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

On the day of their trial, a substantial number of felony defendants fail to appear. Public police have the primary responsibility for pursuing and rearresting defendants who were released on their own recognizance or on cash or government bail. Defendants who made bail by borrowing from a bond dealer, however, must worry about an entirely different pursuer. When a defendant who has borrowed money skips trial, the bond dealer forfeits the bond unless the fugitive is soon returned. As a result, bond dealers have an incentive to monitor their charges and ensure that they do not skip. When a defendant does skip, bond dealers hire bounty hunters to return the defendants to custody. We compare the effectiveness of these two different systems by examining failure-to-appear rates, fugitive rates, and capture rates of felony defendants who fall under the various systems. We apply propensity score and matching techniques.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jlawec:y:2004:v:47:i:1:p:93-122
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29