When pegging is a commitment device: Revisiting conventional wisdom about currency crises

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of International Economics
Year: 2019
Volume: 118
Issue: C
Pages: 233-247

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Could a less conservative central bank, that is, one with a smaller aversion to inflation, be more likely to withstand pressure on its currency peg? Traditional currency-crisis models provide an unambiguous answer: No. We argue that this answer stems from the models' narrow focus on how a central bank's resistance to private-sector pressure affects output and inflation in the short run. The answer may reverse if pegging is a commitment device, serving to address domestic credibility issues in the long run by transferring the conduct of monetary policy abroad. As a less conservative central bank stands to benefit more from such a transfer, it should find a peg more valuable.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:inecon:v:118:y:2019:i:c:p:233-247
Journal Field
International
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29