Leverage and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Unsuccessful Takeovers

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Finance
Year: 1999
Volume: 54
Issue: 2
Pages: 547-580

Authors (2)

Assem Safieddine (not in RePEc) Sheridan Titman (University of Texas-Austin)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper finds that, on average, targets that terminate takeover offers significantly increase their leverage ratios. Targets that increase their leverage ratios the most reduce capital expenditures, sell assets, reduce employment, increase focus, and realize cash flows and share prices that outperform their benchmarks in the five years following the failed takeover. Our evidence suggests that leverage‐increasing targets act in the interests of shareholders when they terminate takeover offers and that higher leverage helps firms remain independent not because it entrenches managers, but because it commits managers to making the improvements that would be made by potential raiders.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jfinan:v:54:y:1999:i:2:p:547-580
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29