Falling and failing (to learn): Evidence from a nation-wide cybersecurity field experiment with SMEs

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2025
Volume: 230
Issue: C

Authors (6)

Gonzalez-Jimenez, David (not in RePEc) Capozza, Francesco (not in RePEc) Dirkmaat, Thomas (not in RePEc) van de Veer, Evelien (not in RePEc) van Druten, Amber (not in RePEc) Baillon, Aurélien (EMLYON Business School)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 6 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Prior experiences are crucial in shaping risk prevention behavior. Previous studies have shown that experiencing a simulated phishing attack (a “phishing drill”) reduces the likelihood of clicking on unsafe links and disclosing one’s password. In a large field experiment involving 670 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their 33,000 employees, we examined the impact of experience on individuals’ ability to detect cyber-security threats, and whether this effect persisted over several months. We collected data at both the company and individual levels, including risk preference, time preference, and trust. Our findings indicate only a non-systematic, short-term effect of previous phishing emails on clicking behavior. A cluster of individuals with greater patience, trust, and risk seeking was more likely to click on phishing links in the first place but then also more likely to benefit from phishing drills.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:230:y:2025:i:c:s0167268124004827
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
6
Added to Database
2026-01-24