Mergers When Prices Are Negotiated: Evidence from the Hospital Industry

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2015
Volume: 105
Issue: 1
Pages: 172-203

Authors (3)

Gautam Gowrisankaran (not in RePEc) Aviv Nevo (not in RePEc) Robert Town (University of Texas-Austin)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We estimate a bargaining model of competition between hospitals and managed care organizations (MCOs) and use the estimates to evaluate the effects of hospital mergers. We find that MCO bargaining restrains hospital prices significantly. The model demonstrates the potential impact of coinsurance rates, which allow MCOs to partly steer patients toward cheaper hospitals. We show that increasing patient coinsurance tenfold would reduce prices by 16 percent. We find that a proposed hospital acquisition in Northern Virginia that was challenged by the Federal Trade Commission would have significantly raised hospital prices. Remedies based on separate bargaining do not alleviate the price increases. (JEL C78, G34, I11, I13, L13)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:1:p:172-203
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29