Evaluating Alternative Energy Policies: An Example Comparing Transportation Energy Investments

B-Tier
Journal: The Energy Journal
Year: 1983
Volume: 4
Issue: 2
Pages: 91-104

Authors (3)

James K. Binkley (not in RePEc) Wallace E. Tyner Marie E. Matthews (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Designing appropriate programs to deal with present and future energy problems faced by the United States has created a need for the evaluation and comparison of different policies. An important component of this is the generation of accurate information concerning the benefits and costs of alternative courses of action. Energy analysis is enormously complex, however, due to the pervasive influence of energy throughout the economy and the manifold factors that must be considered. Schmalensee has written that "discussions of energy policy, especially as regards new technologies, tend rapidly to become unwieldy because of the large number of serious complicating factors whose relevance is arguable" (1980, pp. 2-3). As a result of these complications, any information available to evaluate alternative energy policies Will almost of necessity be incomplete.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:sae:enejou:v:4:y:1983:i:2:p:91-104
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29