Renewable portfolio standards and cost-effective energy-efficiency investment

B-Tier
Journal: Energy Policy
Year: 2009
Volume: 37
Issue: 3
Pages: 774-777

Authors (4)

Mahone, A. (not in RePEc) Woo, C.K. (Energy) Williams, J. (not in RePEc) Horowitz, I. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) and mandates to invest in cost-effective energy efficiency (EE) are increasingly popular policy tools to combat climate change and dependence on fossil fuels. These supply-side and demand-side policies, however, are often uncoordinated. Using California as a case in point, this paper demonstrates that states could improve resource allocation if these two policies were coordinated by incorporating renewable-energy procurement cost into the cost-effectiveness determination for EE investment. In particular, if renewable energy is relatively expensive when compared to conventional energy, increasing the RPS target raises the cost-effective level of EE investment.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:774-777
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-29