Balancing contemporary fairness and historical justice: A 'quasi-equitable' proposal for GHG mitigations

A-Tier
Journal: Energy Economics
Year: 2010
Volume: 32
Issue: 5
Pages: 1121-1130

Authors (2)

Yang, Zili (State University of New York-B...) Sirianni, Philip (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the impasse, caused by polarizing positions of the United States and China - in international negotiations on carbon mitigation. By incorporating the Bern carbon cycle module into the RICE model developed by Nordhaus and Yang (1996), we set up a framework for tracking regional contributions to carbon concentration and to global climate change. Our proposal, labeled the "color preservation" principle, uses regional contribution share to global carbon concentration as the criterion for international cooperation. Through simulations in RICE model with Bern module (RICE-B), we examine the rationales of the arguments made by the United States and China. We conclude that both countries' standpoints are severely flawed. To facilitate the global cooperation on carbon mitigations, major concessions are needed from the two top carbon emitters.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:eneeco:v:32:y:2010:i:5:p:1121-1130
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29