Should the Government Be Paying Investment Fees on $3 Trillion of Tax-Deferred Retirement Assets?

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2025
Volume: 38
Issue: 4
Pages: 1014-1066

Authors (2)

Mattia Landoni (not in RePEc) Stephen P Zeldes (Columbia University)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Under standard assumptions, individuals and the government are indifferent between traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts and “front-loaded” (Roth) accounts. Adding investment fees to this benchmark, individuals are still indifferent, but the government is not. We show that under weak conditions firms charge equal percent fees under both systems, yielding higher dollar fees under Traditional. We estimate that tax deferral increases demand for asset management services by $3.8 trillion, costing the government $23.4 billion in annual fees. In a general equilibrium differentiated-product model, tax deferral produces a larger asset management industry, higher taxes, and lower social welfare.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:38:y:2025:i:4:p:1014-1066.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29