Price discrimination against retail Investors: Evidence from mini options

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2019
Volume: 106
Issue: C
Pages: 50-64

Authors (3)

Li, Yubin (not in RePEc) Zhao, Chen (not in RePEc) Zhong, Zhaodong (Rutgers University-Newark)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper studies the rise and fall of “Mini” options that are especially catered to retail investors for popular but high-priced securities. Using transaction-level data, we find that transaction costs of Mini options are much higher than those of standard options and the difference cannot be fully explained by cost-related determinants. Furthermore, we find evidence of price discrimination against retail investors from analyses of price elasticities of option traders, an event-study of changes in bid-ask spreads around earnings announcements, and comparisons of trade prices paid by Mini and standard option traders for the same security at approximately the same time.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:106:y:2019:i:c:p:50-64
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29