The CAPM strikes back? An equilibrium model with disasters

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Financial Economics
Year: 2019
Volume: 131
Issue: 2
Pages: 269-298

Authors (5)

Bai, Hang (not in RePEc) Hou, Kewei (not in RePEc) Kung, Howard (not in RePEc) Li, Erica X.N. (not in RePEc) Zhang, Lu (Ohio State University)

Score contribution per author:

0.804 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Embedding disasters into a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms induces strong nonlinearity in the pricing kernel, helping explain the empirical failure of the (consumption) CAPM. Our single-factor model reproduces the failure of the CAPM in explaining the value premium in finite samples without disasters and its relative success in samples with disasters. Due to beta measurement errors, the estimated beta-return relation is flat, consistent with the beta “anomaly,” even though the true beta-return relation is strongly positive. Finally, the consumption CAPM fails in simulations, even though a nonlinear model with the true pricing kernel holds exactly by construction.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jfinec:v:131:y:2019:i:2:p:269-298
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-29