Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications

C-Tier
Journal: Economics Letters
Year: 2008
Volume: 98
Issue: 3
Pages: 309-319

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In this paper, we study sensitive of propensity score methods to the specifications through Monte Carlo experiments. We find that the estimated treatment effects on the treated are not sensitive to the specifications if the unconfoundedness assumption holds. When the unconfoundedness assumption fails, the matching results can be sensitive.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolet:v:98:y:2008:i:3:p:309-319
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29