Media versus Special Interests

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Law and Economics
Year: 2013
Volume: 56
Issue: 3
Pages: 521 - 553

Authors (3)

Alexander Dyck (not in RePEc) David Moss (not in RePEc) Luigi Zingales (University of Chicago)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We argue that profit-maximizing media help to overcome the rational ignorance problem highlighted by Anthony Downs. By collecting news and combining it with entertainment, media are able to inform passive voters about regulation and other public policy issues, acting as a (partial) counterbalance to small but well-organized groups. To show the impact this information has on regulation, we document the effect muckraking magazines had on the voting patterns of U.S. representatives and senators on regulatory issues in the early part of the twentieth century. We also discuss the conditions under which media can serve to counterbalance special interests.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/673216
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-29