Heteroskedasticity and Neglected Parameter Heterogeneity

B-Tier
Journal: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Year: 2001
Volume: 63
Issue: 2
Pages: 263-273

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The paper studies the consequences of neglecting parameter heterogeneity for the linear regression model and cross‐sectional data. Monte‐Carlo experiments are used to illustrate that neglected parameter heterogeneity typically leads to (a) regression coefficients that are economically meaningless and (b)significant test statistics for heteroskedasticity and, possibly non‐normality. The paper concludes that evidence for heteroskedasticity should not routinely lead to the use of White's well‐known heteroskedasticity‐consistent variance covariance matrix estimator. If heteroskedasticity is caused by neglected parameter heterogeneity or other causes of heteroskedasticity, such as wrong functional form, White's estimator will not serve any useful purpose.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:obuest:v:63:y:2001:i:2:p:263-273
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29