Long-term absenteeism and moral hazard—Evidence from a natural experiment

B-Tier
Journal: Labour Economics
Year: 2013
Volume: 24
Issue: C
Pages: 277-292

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper shows that long-term sick employees are unlikely to be very responsive to moderate monetary labor supply incentives. The paper, theoretically and empirically, evaluates the labor supply effects of cuts in statutory sick pay levels on long-term absenteeism in Germany. Cutting sick pay did not significantly reduce the average incidence and duration of sick leave periods longer than six weeks. A simple theoretical model confirms the empirical findings under the assumption that the long-term sick are seriously sick. Thus, moral hazard seems to be less of an issue in the upper tail of the sickness spell distribution. However, the results show heterogeneity in the effects and significant duration decreases for certain subsamples.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:labeco:v:24:y:2013:i:c:p:277-292
Journal Field
Labor
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29