On the welfare equivalence of asset markets and banking in Diamond Dybvig economies

C-Tier
Journal: Economics Letters
Year: 2013
Volume: 121
Issue: 3
Pages: 356-359

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Why do people choose bank deposit contracts over a direct participation in asset markets? In their seminal paper, Diamond and Dybvig’s (1983) answer this question by claiming that bank deposit contracts can implement allocations that are welfare superior to asset markets equilibria. The present paper demonstrates that this claim is false whenever the asset market participants are highly rational.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolet:v:121:y:2013:i:3:p:356-359
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29