Demand for financial advice: Evidence from a randomized choice experiment

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2024
Volume: 163
Issue: C

Authors (5)

de Bruin, Boudewijn (not in RePEc) Cherednychenko, Olha (not in RePEc) Hermes, Niels (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) Kramer, Marc (not in RePEc) Meyer, Marco (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.402 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

How does the salience and structure of costs for financial advice influence consumer demand? This study conducts a randomized choice experiment exploring possible consequences of introducing a commission ban in the retail mortgage market. A sample of more than 2100 participants of the Dutch Household Survey panel reveals that in a fee-based regime, in which the costs of advice are salient and must be paid upfront, demand for advice decreases by 25 % compared with a situation in which the same costs are embedded in mortgage payments. We do not find evidence that such demand effects for financial advice varies across less versus more sophisticated customers. At the same time, we do find that customers with a stronger focus on the present express less willingness to pay for advice upfront.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s0378426624001109
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-02-02