A note on majority rule and neutrality with an application to state votes at the Constitutional Convention of 1787

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2016
Volume: 167
Issue: 3
Pages: 245-255

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Abstract Majority rule used in the legislative process has a bias toward the status quo. This implies that proposals are less likely to pass when the number of voters casting either “yes” or “no” votes sums to an even number rather than an odd number. The implication is weakly supported by examining state votes of 552 motions made at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. A difference is found in the expected direction but is not statistically significant at traditional levels.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:167:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-016-0339-2
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-02-02