How Do Regulators Set the Countercyclical Capital Buffer?

B-Tier
Journal: International Journal of Central Banking
Year: 2023
Volume: 19
Issue: 3
Pages: 99-137

Authors (2)

Bernhard Herz (Universität Bayreuth) Jochen Keller (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

As part of the Basel III regulatory framework, the macroprudential countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) was introduced to mitigate the procyclicality in the financial system. National designated authorities are supposed to set the CCyB based on a “guided discretion” approach that combines rulebased and discretionary elements. We identify a CCyB puzzle, as we do not find the credit-to-GDP gap, the recommended rule-based component of the CCyB, to be crucial for buffer decisions. Instead, designated authorities appear to base their CCyB decisions in a systematic way on the discretionary elements of the framework, namely the development of house prices and non-performing loans. We also find national institutional frameworks to be relevant for CCyB policies.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ijc:ijcjou:y:2023:q:3:a:3
Journal Field
Macro
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-02-02