Second‐Mover Advantages in Dynamic Quality Competition

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Year: 2001
Volume: 10
Issue: 3
Pages: 419-433

Authors (2)

Heidrun C. Hoppe (not in RePEc) Ulrich Lehmann‐Grube (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper explores a dynamic model of product innovation, extending the work of Dutta, Lach, and Rustichini (1995). It is shown that if R&D costs for quality improvements are low, the dynamic competition is structured as a race for being the pioneer firm with payoff equalization in equilibrium, but switches to a waiting game with a second‐mover advantage in equilibrium if R&D costs are high. Moreover, the second‐mover advantage increases monotonically as R&D becomes more costly.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jemstr:v:10:y:2001:i:3:p:419-433
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-02-02