Double-fortified salt reduces anemia, benefit:cost ratio is modestly favorable

B-Tier
Journal: Food Policy
Year: 2011
Volume: 36
Issue: 5
Pages: 581-587

Authors (3)

Horton, Sue (University of Waterloo) Wesley, Annie (not in RePEc) Venkatesh Mannar, M.G. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Iron deficiency is very widespread, with adverse consequences for health and cognition. Iron supplementation is not popular for long-term use, and cereal fortification is not feasible where milling occurs locally. Double-fortified salt (DFS: using both iron and iodine) is an alternative. The study undertakes a literature survey to find the effect of DFS on hemoglobin, and then uses a previous algorithm to make calculations for India. The benefit:cost ratio was estimated as 2.4:1 if only the benefits to children and women were included, and between 4:1 and 5:1 if anemia levels for men also decreased. This is just a little lower than the median ratio estimated for iron fortification of cereal staples (6.7:1), for home fortification for children less than two (37:1), and for biofortification - breeding for high iron - of cereals (high, but no exact figure available). Double-fortified salt is therefore a good alternative for improving iron status in populations where fortification of other staple foods does not achieve desired coverage.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jfpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:581-587
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-02-02