The Size and Significance of the Pareto Set in Spatial Voting Models.

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2003
Volume: 116
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 19-29

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The size of the Pareto set in the issue space of spatial voting models is a function of the tax prices that voters are charged. When all voters pay Lindahl prices for all goods, the Pareto set collapses to a single point. The Pareto set can be enlarged by altering tax shares so they are further from Lindahl prices, and can be reduced by moving toward Lindahl pricing. A smaller Pareto set moves voters closer to consensus on issues, so reduces political decisionmaking costs and makes the political system more stable. Copyright 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:116:y:2003:i:1-2:p:19-29
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-02-02