Why do crises go to waste? Fiscal austerity and public service reform

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2014
Volume: 158
Issue: 1
Pages: 209-220

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In the tight budgetary conditions following the 2008 financial crisis, governments have proposed saving money by reforming public services. This paper argues that tight budget constraints make reform harder by introducing an information problem. Governments are uncertain about bureaucratic departments’ effectiveness. Normally, effective departments can be identified by increasing their budget, since they can use the increase to produce more than ineffective departments can. When budgets must be cut, however, ineffective departments can mimic effective ones by reducing their output. Budget cuts thus harm both short-run productive efficiency, and long-run allocative efficiency. I confirm these predictions in a US dataset. Low marginal productivity bureaucracies reduce output by more than expected in response to a budget cut, and budget setters respond less to observed short-run marginal productivity after cutback years. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:158:y:2014:i:1:p:209-220
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-02-02