Profitability of Direct Greenhouse Gas Measurements in Carbon Credit Schemes of Peatland Rewetting

B-Tier
Journal: Ecological Economics
Year: 2018
Volume: 146
Issue: C
Pages: 766-771

Authors (5)

Günther, Anke (not in RePEc) Böther, Stefanie (not in RePEc) Couwenberg, John (not in RePEc) Hüttel, Silke (Georg-August-Universität Götti...) Jurasinski, Gerald (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.402 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

MoorFutures® is the world's first carbon credit scheme from peatland rewetting. Thus far, MoorFutures® rely on proxies (greenhouse gas emission site types or GESTs) to estimate emission reductions. Here, we tested the profitability of including direct greenhouse gas (GHG) measurements of project emissions for a range of rewetting costs and vegetation scenarios based on a hypothetical MoorFutures® project. In almost all scenarios GEST assessments underestimated emission reductions compared with direct measurements. Including direct measurements was lucrative in >50% of all vegetation scenario/rewetting cost combinations with net profits ranging from EUR −8.18 to 26.31 per certificate. Profitability was achieved at rewetting costs of ~EUR 5400ha−1 upward. More sophisticated GHG measurements became profitable at twice the rewetting costs. In cases where direct flux measurements do not generate a profit they can strengthen reliability and buyers' trust and thus support higher prices of the certificates.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:766-771
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-02-02