Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
This paper empirically tests if prospect theory's loss aversion can explain an individual's real-world insurance take-up behavior. Using American Life Panel data, this paper shows that loss-averse individuals have a significantly lower ownership rate of private long-term care insurance and supplemental disability insurance than other sample populations. The results are consistent with the prospect theory, which predicts that loss-aversion may decrease insurance demand if an individual's reference points are “the status quo wealth level when they do not engage in insurance contracts.” This paper also provides suggestive evidence that reference points are important in determining the relationship between loss-aversion and insurance ownership by showing that the negative association is not observed in the take-up of auto insurance, which is one of the most widely held insurance products and often regarded as a basic necessity.