Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 2010
Volume: 92
Issue: 4
Pages: 693-713

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper compares economic outcomes across areas in India that were under direct British colonial rule with areas that were under indirect colonial rule. Controlling for selective annexation using a specific policy rule, I find that areas that experienced direct rule have significantly lower levels of access to schools, health centers, and roads in the postcolonial period. I find evidence that the quality of governance in the colonial period has a significant and persistent effect on postcolonial outcomes. (c) 2010 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:92:y:2010:i:4:p:693-713
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-02-02