Rules versus discretion in bank resolution

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2021
Volume: 34
Issue: 4
Pages: 1747-1788

Authors (4)

Thorsten Beck (European University Institute) Samuel Da-Rocha-Lopes (not in RePEc) André F Silva (Federal Reserve Board (Board o...) Francesca Cornelli (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We analyze the credit supply and real effects of bank bail-ins by exploiting the unexpected failure and subsequent resolution of a major Portuguese bank. Using loan-level data, we show that while firms more exposed to the bail-in suffered a significant contraction of credit at the intensive margin, they were on average able to compensate for the supply-driven shock. However, affected SMEs experienced a binding reduction of funds available through credit lines, and those with lower internal liquidity increased precautionary cash holdings and reduced investment and employment. Our results highlight the trade-off policymakers face when considering this new bank resolution mechanism.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:4:p:1747-1788.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24