What do Happiness Data Mean? Theory and Survey Evidence

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of the European Economic Association
Year: 2023
Volume: 21
Issue: 6
Pages: 2377-2412

Authors (5)

Daniel J Benjamin (University of Southern Califor...) Jakina Debnam Guzman (not in RePEc) Marc Fleurbaey (not in RePEc) Ori Heffetz (not in RePEc) Miles Kimball (University of Colorado)

Score contribution per author:

0.804 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

What utility notion—e.g. flow/lifetime, self/family-centered—do self-reported well-being (SWB) questions measure? Existing applications make different assumptions regarding the (i) life domains, (ii) time horizons, and (iii) other-regarding preferences captured by SWB data. To obtain relevant evidence, we ask survey respondents what they had in mind regarding (i)–(iii) when answering commonly used—life satisfaction, happiness, ladder—and new SWB questions. We find that respondents’ self-reports differ from researchers’ assumptions and differ across SWB questions and sociodemographic groups. At the same time, simple SWB-question wording tweaks are effective in moving self-reports toward desired interpretations. We outline actionable suggestions for SWB researchers. (JEL: D69, D90, I31)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:jeurec:v:21:y:2023:i:6:p:2377-2412.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-24