Is Unbiased Financial Advice to Retail Investors Sufficient? Answers from a Large Field Study

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2012
Volume: 25
Issue: 4
Pages: 975-1032

Authors (5)

Utpal Bhattacharya (Hong Kong University of Scienc...) Andreas Hackethal (not in RePEc) Simon Kaesler (not in RePEc) Benjamin Loos (not in RePEc) Steffen Meyer (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.804 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Working with one of the largest brokerages in Germany, we record what happens when unbiased investment advice is offered to a random set of approximately 8,000 active retail customers out of the brokerage's several hundred thousand retail customers. We find that investors who most need the financial advice are least likely to obtain it. The investors who do obtain the advice (about 5%), however, hardly follow the advice and do not improve their portfolio efficiency by much. Overall, our results imply that the mere availability of unbiased financial advice is a necessary but not sufficient condition for benefiting retail investors. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]., Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:25:y:2012:i:4:p:975-1032
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-24