An approach to quantify parameter uncertainty in early assessment of novel health technologies

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2022
Volume: 31
Issue: S1
Pages: 116-134

Authors (4)

Rowan Iskandar (not in RePEc) Carlo Federici (not in RePEc) Cassandra Berns (not in RePEc) Carl Rudolf Blankart (Universität Bern)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Health economic modeling of novel technology at the early stages of a product lifecycle has been used to identify technologies that are likely to be cost‐effective. Such early assessments are challenging due to the potentially limited amount of data. Modelers typically conduct uncertainty analyses to evaluate their effect on decision‐relevant outcomes. Current approaches, however, are limited in their scope of application and imposes an unverifiable assumption, that is, uncertainty can be precisely represented by a probability distribution. In the absence of reliable data, an approach that uses the fewest number of assumptions is desirable. This study introduces a generalized approach for quantifying parameter uncertainty, that is, probability bound analysis (PBA), that does not require a precise specification of a probability distribution in the context of early‐stage health economic modeling. We introduce the concept of a probability box (p‐box) as a measure of uncertainty without necessitating a precise probability distribution. We provide formulas for a p‐box given data on summary statistics of a parameter. We describe an approach to propagate p‐boxes into a model and provide step‐by‐step guidance on how to implement PBA. We conduct a case and examine the differences between the status‐quo and PBA approaches and their potential implications on decision‐making.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:31:y:2022:i:s1:p:116-134
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24