Stated preferences outperform elicited preferences for predicting reported compliance with COVID-19 prophylactic measures

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Year: 2023
Volume: 107
Issue: C

Authors (7)

Rafaï, Ismaël (not in RePEc) Blayac, Thierry (Université de Montpellier) Dubois, Dimitri (not in RePEc) Duchêne, Sébastien (not in RePEc) Nguyen-Van, Phu (Université Paris-Nanterre (Par...) Ventelou, Bruno (not in RePEc) Willinger, Marc (Université de Montpellier)

Score contribution per author:

0.287 = (α=2.01 / 7 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This article studies the behavioral and socio-demographic determinants of reported compliance with prophylactic measures against COVID-19: barrier gestures, lockdown restrictions and mask wearing. The study contrasts two types of measures for behavioral determinants: experimentally elicited preferences (risk tolerance, time preferences, social value orientation and cooperativeness) and stated preferences (risk tolerance, time preferences, and the GSS trust question). Data were collected from a representative sample of the inland French adult population (N=1154) surveyed during the first lockdown in May 2020, and the experimental tasks were carried out on-line. The in-sample and out-of-sample predictive power of several regression models - which vary in the set of variables that they include - are studied and compared. Overall, we find that stated preferences are better predictors of compliance with these prophylactic measures than preferences elicited through incentivized experiments: self-reported level of risk, patience and trust are predicting compliance, while elicited measures of risk-aversion, patience, cooperation and prosociality did not.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001155
Journal Field
Experimental
Author Count
7
Added to Database
2026-01-24